South Atlantic Water Science Center - Georgia
ABOUT THE GEORGIA
South Atlantic Water Science Center - Georgia Publications
Do the pesticides I use contaminate the rivers everyone uses?
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is conducting studies to address this difficult question. As a part of the USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program, water samples collected during 1993 and 1994 from streams draining urban and agricultural watersheds in Georgia have been analyzed for many commonly used pesticides. Preliminary findings indicate that in Georgia, a greater number of pesticides are present in water from urban watersheds, generally at higher concentrations, and for a greater part of the year than in water from agricultural watersheds. When compared to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking-water standards, the trace concentrations of pesticides detected in both urban and agricultural watersheds are not believed to pose an immediate human-health risk. However, several insecticides present in urban watersheds were at concentrations thought to adversely affect aquatic life.
Most pesticides are man-made chemicals. They are used to control pests such as weeds (herbicides), insects (insecticides), fungi (fungicides), and so forth. Pesticides present in streams, even at very low concentrations, can make the water unsuitable for human consumption or render it toxic to aquatic organisms.
The USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program is evaluating the relation of land use to surface- and ground-water quality. The NAWQA study of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) River basin has conducted an investigation to determine the presence, persistence, and water-quality effects of pesticides in streams draining small watersheds representative of urban and agricultural land-use areas in the basin. This pamphlet summarizes preliminary information from that investigation.
Water samples were collected weekly from March 1993 through April 1994 at an urban watershed in Metropolitan Atlanta and an agricultural watershed in southwest Georgia. The USGS National Water Quality Laboratory analyzed the samples for 84 pesticides commonly used throughout the United States. Many of these pesticides are used for weed and insect control in the ACF River basin. However, analyses do not include all pesticides in current use, having excluded a number of commonly used pesticides such as paraquat, methanearsonate, glyphosate, DSMA, MSMA, and several chlorophenoxy herbicides.
18 herbicides and 7 insecticides were detected in water samples from the urban watershed.
Median concentrations for each detected pesticide were well below EPA standards and guidelines for drinking water (see table). In one sample, the maximum concentration for the herbicide simazine exceeded the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water allowed by EPA drinking-water standards, however, the median concentration for all samples was only 3 percent of the MCL. Atrazine and diazinon had median concentrations that were only 1 percent of the MCL and 3 percent of the lifetime health advisory, respectively. However, maximum concentrations of five detected insecticides and median concentrations of chlorpyrifos and diazinon exceeded guidelines for protection of aquatic life.
16 herbicides and 4 insecticides were detected in water samples from the agricultural watershed.
No pesticide concentrations exceeded EPA standards or guidelines for drinking water. The insecticide carbaryl was detected in one sample at a concentration that exceeded guidelines for protection of aquatic life. However, median concentrations for all detected pesticides were below the method detection limits and well below standards and guidelines for drinking water and protection of aquatic life.
Most herbicides detected were primarily used for control of weeds on cropland, although additional herbicides used for vegetation control in noncrop areas also were detected. The insecticides detected are used on a number of crops and orchards, as well as for use at homes.
The maximum contaminant level (MCL) is the maximum concentration allowed in drinking water according to EPA drinking-water standards. The lifetime health-advisory (HA) level is the maximum concentration in drinking water that would not cause adverse human-health effects, excluding cancer (based on a 150-pound adult consuming about 2 quarts of water per day for a period of 70 years). The standards for protection of aquatic life are recommended by the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering, and are based on the best available data regarding maximum concentrations in water that are not expected to adversely affect aquatic life.
To date, 2,4-D is the only pesticide detected in waters within the ACF River basin that has an estimate of cancer risk from drinking water. The estimated risk is based on the assumption that if a 150-pound adult drank about 2 quarts of water per day containing 100 micrograms per liter (µg/L) 2,4-D during an average 70-year life span, that person would increase his/her chances of contracting cancer by 1 in a million. The highest measured 2,4-D concentration in samples collected to date (July 1994) was 0.63 µg/L. The assessment of risk associated with human activities is very complex, however, the adjoining table helps to put into perspective the risk associated with 2,4-D in water as related to other selected human activities. This perspective is not intended to minimize the importance of detecting harmful chemicals in the water resources of the ACF River basin, but rather to indicate that even though there should be concern that pesticides are present, they are present at very low concentrations and generally do not pose serious health concerns.
Potential sources for pesticides in urban streams include:
The Cooperative Extension Service of the University of Georgia College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences (Murphy, 1993) offers the following suggestions for the safe use of pesticides. Following the suggestions will also lessen the risk of contaminating surface and ground water.
The full report can be ordered from USGS. You may order online, or call or write: